{"id":37600,"date":"2022-11-02T10:32:15","date_gmt":"2022-11-02T17:32:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sweet-pascal.52-27-215-206.plesk.page\/?p=37600"},"modified":"2022-11-02T10:32:19","modified_gmt":"2022-11-02T17:32:19","slug":"election-2022-svgop-message-to-san-jose-voters-no-on-measure-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/election-2022-svgop-message-to-san-jose-voters-no-on-measure-i\/","title":{"rendered":"Election 2022: SVGOP message to San Jos\u00e9 voters: NO on Measure i"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In November 2020, despite uniform support from political, non-profit, and corporate elites, voters across Santa Clara County and throughout California rejected the Democratic legislature\u2019s attempt to remove from the State Constitution the provision that prohibits government institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity, in public employment, contracting, and education. The voters reaffirmed Rev. Martin Luther King Junior\u2019s vision of a nation of equal treatment under the law, where each individual is judged by the content of one\u2019s character and not immutable characteristics that were an accident of one\u2019s birth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now, politicians in San Jos\u00e9 are attempting to put the concepts of \u201crace\u201d, \u201csocial justice\u201d, and \u201cequity\u201d at the forefront of all City decision-making, as a part of changes to the City Charter found in Measure i. Further, Measure i would place non-citizens on quasi-judicial boards &amp; commissions. The Santa Clara County Republican Party voted unanimously to advise voters to REJECT Measure i.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>San Jos\u00e9 Measure i consolidates four unrelated recommendations brought to the City Council by the City\u2019s Charter Commission. It was placed on the ballot by the City Council with only one dissenting vote. This grab-bag of recommendations ranges from the seemingly innocuous to the insidious as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Measure i adds the Board of Fair Campaign and Political Practices (\u201cElections Commission\u201d) to the City Charter. This measure expands the Board&#8217;s role in elections and sets the stage for the radical, costly idea of non-citizen voting.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Measure i removes the requirement that members of the Planning, Civil Service, and Salary Setting Commissions be electors and\/or citizens. &nbsp;In other words, non-citizens could be making quasi-judicial decisions about San Jose development projects, appeals over employment actions, and the pay and benefits of City Councilmembers. This could subject the decisions of these boards and commissions to legal challenge and move San Jos\u00e9 closer to non-citizen voting. Out of over 90,000 local governmental units in the USA, only about 13 allow non-citizen voting and an even smaller number allow non-citizens to serve on boards or commissions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Measure i removes gender-specific language from the City Charter. All references that currently read &#8220;he or she&#8221;, or &#8220;him or her&#8221;, will be changed to read &#8220;they&#8221; or &#8220;them&#8221; &#8211; even where it would be grammatically incorrect. This is yet another Woke, Orwellian attempt by the far left wing of the Democratic Party to force radical gender theory on citizens.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Measure i requires the City Council to adopt \u201cequity values, standards, and assessments.\u201d It adds the Woke terms &#8220;Race&#8221;, &#8220;Equity&#8221;, and &#8220;Social Justice&#8221;, to the City Charter and it makes these considerations CENTRAL to ALL CITY DECISION-MAKING. &nbsp;Inserting &#8220;race&#8221; &#8211; along with the ill-defined terms of &#8220;equity&#8221; and &#8220;social justice&#8221; &#8211; into our City Charter takes us backward to the 17<sup>th<\/sup>, 18<sup>th<\/sup>, and 19<sup>th<\/sup> centuries, not forward as a community. From its inception in the late 1600s, the concept of race was developed to divide people by color or ethnic heritage. It is a vile concept that deserves to be placed in the dustbin of history \u2013 not made central to City decision-making. &nbsp;This provision of Measure i is antithetical to the values embodied in the American Bill of Rights \u2013 values that Americans of all backgrounds strongly embrace.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>As we have seen in specious attacks on honorable candidates like Matt Mahan and Irene Smith and on Democratic officeholders like Bryan Do, in this very election cycle, race is used as a club by the far left to bludgeon their opponents and divide our community. It\u2019s important that San Jos\u00e9 voters send a clear message that we stand for EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL AMERICANS with a resounding NO vote on Measure i. Shane Patrick Connolly<br>Chairman<br>Santa Clara County Republican Party<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.svgop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/svgop-logo-real.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">www.svgop.com<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In November 2020, despite uniform support from political, non-profit, and corporate elites, voters across Santa Clara County and throughout California rejected the Democratic legislature\u2019s attempt to remove from the State Constitution the provision that prohibits government institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity, in public employment, contracting, and education. The voters reaffirmed Rev. Martin Luther &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":37601,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[70,46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-op-ed","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37600"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37600\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/37601"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}