{"id":55357,"date":"2025-03-17T10:30:19","date_gmt":"2025-03-17T17:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/vtas-legal-request-to-stop-strike-temporarily-denied\/"},"modified":"2025-03-17T10:30:19","modified_gmt":"2025-03-17T17:30:19","slug":"vtas-legal-request-to-stop-strike-temporarily-denied","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vietvalley.com\/vtas-legal-request-to-stop-strike-temporarily-denied\/","title":{"rendered":"VTA\u2019s legal request to stop strike temporarily denied"},"content":{"rendered":"
VTA\u2019s legal complaint against its striking workers is stalled in the courts, delaying the potential return of bus and light rail public transit service in the region. Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Daniel Nishigaya has denied VTA\u2019s request for an injunction, on the grounds that the filing isn\u2019t compliant with California\u2019s Rules of Court. Nishigaya wrote Sunday the transit agency can receive a decision after it resubmits a proper application. VTA has been seeking legal intervention to stop Amalgamated Transit Union Local 265\u2019s weeklong strike after contract negotiations fizzled out with no deal on the table. A VTA spokesperson…<\/p>\n